Harun Farocki Retrospektive

Nach der Eröffnung der Ausstellungen „Mit anderen Mitteln / By Other Means“ im n.b.k.uratiert von Antje Ehmann und Carles Guerra, sowie „El Usman Faroqhi Here and a Yonder – On Finding Poise in Disorientation“ bei Savvy Contemporary, die vorgestern stattfanden, beginnt heute Abend die Retrospektive der Kino- und Fernseharbeiten Harun Farockis im Kino Arsenal. Kuratiert wurden die beiden Reihen „Nacheinander“ und „Nebeneinander“, die bis Ende November laufen, vom Harun Farocki Institut gemeinsam mit dem Kino Arsenal (Stefanie Schulte Strathaus).

Mehr über das Programm von heute und die Filme, die im September folgen werden, hier auf der Arsenal-Website.

Einen Überblick über das gesamte Spektrum der Retrospektive*, zu der auch die temporäre Akademie „Farocki Now“ im HKW und silent green gehören, ermöglicht die Website www.harunfarockiretrospektive.org

Ab 17.00 Uhr gibt es zudem die Gelegenheit, die Eröffnung der Ausstellung „Harun Farocki und die Musik“ in der Galerie Barbara Weiss zu besuchen.

*Die Harun Farocki Retrospektive ist ein Projekt des Neuen Berliner Kunstvereins (n.b.k.n Kooperation mit dem Arsenal – Institut für Film und Videokunst, dem Harun Farocki Institut, der Harun Farocki GbR, dem silent green Kulturquartier, dem Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König, Savvy Contemporary und dem Haus der Kulturen der Welt im Rahmen der Berlin Art Week, gefördert von der Senatsverwaltung für Kultur und Europa.

15.09.2017, Projekte / Veranstaltung

David Graeber (1961-2020) on What Would It Take (from his The Democracy Project. A History, a Crisis, a Movement, 2013, p. 193): „We have little idea what sort of organizations, or for that matter, technologies, would emerge if free people were unfettered to use their imagination to actually solve collective problems rather than to make them worse. But the primary question is: how do we even get there? What would it take to allow our political and economic systems to become a mode of collective problem solving rather than, as they are now, a mode of collective war?“

07.09.2020, Tom

T.J. Demos on why cultural practitioners should never surrender, via tranzit.sk:  „For artists, writers, and curators, as art historians and teachers, the meaning-production of an artwork is never finished, never fully appropriated and coopted, in my view, and we should never surrender it; the battle over significance is ongoing. We see that battle rise up in relation to racist and colonial monuments these days in the US, the UK, and South Africa. While the destruction of such monuments results from and is enabling of radical politics, it’s still not enough until the larger institutions that support and maintain their existence as well as the continuation of the politics they represent are also torn down. This is urgent as well in the cultural sphere, including the arts institutions, universities, art markets, discursive sphere of magazines and journals, all in thrall to neoliberalism, where we must recognize that it’s ultimately inadequate to simply inject critical or radical content into these frameworks, which we know excel at incorporating those anti-extractivist expressions into further forms of cultural capital and wealth accumulation. What’s required is more of the building of nonprofit and community-based institutions, organizing radical political horizons and solidarity between social formations.“

21.08.2020, Tom

Bernard Stiegler, quoted from The Neganthropocene (trans. Daniel Ross): „Does anyone really believe that it is possible to ‘solve’ the problems of climate change, habitat destruction and cultural destruction without addressing the consumerist basis of the present macro-economic system, or vice versa, or without addressing the way in which this system depletes the psychic energy required to find the collective will, belief, hope and reason to address this planetary challenge? Can this consumerism really survive the coming wave of automation that threatens to decimate its customer base and undermine the ‘consumer confidence’ that is fundamental to its perpetual growth requirements, themselves antithetical, once again, to the problems of biospherical preservation?“

14.08.2020, Tom
mehrweniger Kurznews