Essay Film Festival 2017: Thinking Cinema on Television

Für das Londoner „Essay Film Festival“ hat Volker Pantenburg vier Sendungen des WDR sowie zwei Filme Peter Nestlers ausgewählt , die unter dem Titel „Thinking Cinema on Television: Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR), ca. 1975“ gezeigt und vorgestellt werden. Der Blick auf diese Produktionen macht ein Netzwerk von Individuen, Verbindungen (etwa zwischen dem WDR und der Zeitschrift FILMKRITIK) und intellektuellen Austauschs sichtbar, das zur Historisierung des aktuell boomenden „Video Essays“ beitragen kann.

Werner Dütsch, lange Jahre einer der zentralen Redakteure der WDR Filmredaktion, wird ebenfalls Gast des Festivals sein und einige Sendungen vorstellen und diskutieren.

Kevin B. Lee zurzeit Resident des Farocki Instituts, wird beim Festival ebenfalls seine und andere Video Essays vorstellen.

Programm 1:

Filmemigration aus Nazi-Deutschland – Teil 1 (Günter Peter Straschek)
Fritz Lang (Werner Dütsch)

Programm 2:

Aufsätze und Von Griechenland (Peter Nestler)
Telekritik: Über zwei Filme von Peter Nestler (Rainer Gansera)

Programm 3:

Erzählen (Harun Farocki und Ingemo Engström)

Hier das Handout zu den Programmen als PDF.

10.03.2017, Forschung / Projekte

David Graeber (1961-2020) on What Would It Take (from his The Democracy Project. A History, a Crisis, a Movement, 2013, p. 193): „We have little idea what sort of organizations, or for that matter, technologies, would emerge if free people were unfettered to use their imagination to actually solve collective problems rather than to make them worse. But the primary question is: how do we even get there? What would it take to allow our political and economic systems to become a mode of collective problem solving rather than, as they are now, a mode of collective war?“

07.09.2020, Tom

T.J. Demos on why cultural practitioners should never surrender, via  „For artists, writers, and curators, as art historians and teachers, the meaning-production of an artwork is never finished, never fully appropriated and coopted, in my view, and we should never surrender it; the battle over significance is ongoing. We see that battle rise up in relation to racist and colonial monuments these days in the US, the UK, and South Africa. While the destruction of such monuments results from and is enabling of radical politics, it’s still not enough until the larger institutions that support and maintain their existence as well as the continuation of the politics they represent are also torn down. This is urgent as well in the cultural sphere, including the arts institutions, universities, art markets, discursive sphere of magazines and journals, all in thrall to neoliberalism, where we must recognize that it’s ultimately inadequate to simply inject critical or radical content into these frameworks, which we know excel at incorporating those anti-extractivist expressions into further forms of cultural capital and wealth accumulation. What’s required is more of the building of nonprofit and community-based institutions, organizing radical political horizons and solidarity between social formations.“

21.08.2020, Tom

Bernard Stiegler, quoted from The Neganthropocene (trans. Daniel Ross): „Does anyone really believe that it is possible to ‘solve’ the problems of climate change, habitat destruction and cultural destruction without addressing the consumerist basis of the present macro-economic system, or vice versa, or without addressing the way in which this system depletes the psychic energy required to find the collective will, belief, hope and reason to address this planetary challenge? Can this consumerism really survive the coming wave of automation that threatens to decimate its customer base and undermine the ‘consumer confidence’ that is fundamental to its perpetual growth requirements, themselves antithetical, once again, to the problems of biospherical preservation?“

14.08.2020, Tom
mehrweniger Kurznews