Symposium: Recht auf Öffentlichkeit – Arbeit mit TV-Archiven, 23. Sep 2020, Arsenal @ silent green

Am 23. September 2020 findet das ganztägige Symposium Recht auf Öffentlichkeit – Arbeit mit TV-Archiven im silent green Kulturquartier statt, das vom Arsenal – Institut für Film und Videokunst organisiert wird und an dem das HaFI teilnimmt. Das Symposium diskutiert die Möglichkeit, aus den Archiven der TV-Sender „Living Archives“ zu machen, deren Bestände für die Forschung und kulturelle Bildung zur Verfügung stehen. Das Panel Eine brauchbare Bibliothek aus Bildern ist Harun Farocki und seiner Zusammenarbeit mit dem WDR (Westdeutscher Rundfunk) gewidmet. Da die Anzahl der Plätze begrenzt ist, wird um eine Anmeldung bis zum 21. September unter der Adresse gebeten. Mehr Informationen hier.

Begleitend zum Symposium und im Rahmen des arsenal-3-Programms wird in der zweiten Septemberhälfte der im Auftrag vom WDR produzierte Film ZUR ANSICHT: PETER WEISS (1979, BRD) von Harun Farocki gestreamt. Mit Drehmaterial zu ZUR ANSICHT: PETER WEISS werden zudem nicht verwendete Materialien aus dem HaFI Archiv gezeigt. Mehr auf der Webseite des Arsenal hier.

11.09.2020, Projekte / Veranstaltung

Sara Ahmed on the perfomativity of disgust (from The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2004): “To name something as disgusting is to transfer the stickiness of the word ‘disgust’ to an object, which henceforth becomes generated as the very thing that is spoken. The relationship between the stickiness of the sign and the stickiness of the object is crucial to the performativity of disgust as well as the apparent resistance of disgust reactions to ‘newness’ in terms of the generation of different kinds of objects. The object that is generated as a disgusting (bad) object through the speech act comes to stick. It becomes sticky and acquires a fetish quality, which then engenders its own effects.”

07.11.2020, Tom

David Graeber (1961-2020) on What Would It Take (from his The Democracy Project. A History, a Crisis, a Movement, 2013, p. 193): „We have little idea what sort of organizations, or for that matter, technologies, would emerge if free people were unfettered to use their imagination to actually solve collective problems rather than to make them worse. But the primary question is: how do we even get there? What would it take to allow our political and economic systems to become a mode of collective problem solving rather than, as they are now, a mode of collective war?“

07.09.2020, Tom

T.J. Demos on why cultural practitioners should never surrender, via  „For artists, writers, and curators, as art historians and teachers, the meaning-production of an artwork is never finished, never fully appropriated and coopted, in my view, and we should never surrender it; the battle over significance is ongoing. We see that battle rise up in relation to racist and colonial monuments these days in the US, the UK, and South Africa. While the destruction of such monuments results from and is enabling of radical politics, it’s still not enough until the larger institutions that support and maintain their existence as well as the continuation of the politics they represent are also torn down. This is urgent as well in the cultural sphere, including the arts institutions, universities, art markets, discursive sphere of magazines and journals, all in thrall to neoliberalism, where we must recognize that it’s ultimately inadequate to simply inject critical or radical content into these frameworks, which we know excel at incorporating those anti-extractivist expressions into further forms of cultural capital and wealth accumulation. What’s required is more of the building of nonprofit and community-based institutions, organizing radical political horizons and solidarity between social formations.“

21.08.2020, Tom
mehrweniger Kurznews