Schriften 2: Kaja Silverman / Harun Farocki: Von Godard sprechen

KS In diesem zweiten Prolog redet Godard kein Wort. Die kritische Reflexion, die ihren Ort außerhalb der Erzählung zu haben scheint, leistet Sandrine.

HF Allerdings stehen beide Vorreden in Numéro deux der Selbstaufhebung Godards als Autor entgegen. Es scheint, als fürchte Godard, dass ohne die Vorreden alles Nachfolgende missverstanden werden könnte. Diese Angst macht ihn präsenter, als wenn er einfach bloß als der Regisseur von Numéro deux ausgewiesen wäre.

KS Autorschaft komplett aufzuheben, ist wahrscheinlich unmöglich. Es kann aber sinnvoll sein, das Unmögliche zu versuchen.

(Auszug aus dem Kapitel zu „Numéro Deux“, S. 163/164)

Gerade im Druck:

Kaja Silverman / Harun Farocki: Von Godard sprechen, hg. von Doreen Mende, Köln: Walther König 2018 [= Harun Farocki: Schriften. Band 2]

16.12.2017, Projekte / Publikation

Jodi Dean on work in neofeudal times, via Los Angeles Review of Books: „When work is imagined — and some on the left think that we should adopt a ‚postwork imaginary‘ — it looks like either romantic risk-free farming or tech-work, ‚immaterial labor.‘ By now, the exposés on the drudgery of call center work, not to mention the trauma-inducing labor of monitoring sites like Facebook for disturbing, illicit content, have made the inadequacy of the idea of ‚immaterial labor‘ undeniable. It should be similarly apparent that the postwork imaginary likewise erases the production and maintenance of infrastructure, the wide array of labor necessary for social reproduction, and the underlying state structure.“

23.05.2020, Tom

Naomi Klein on the „Screen New Deal“ (via The Intercept): „Calling [Bill] Gates a ‚visionary,‘ [New York governor Andrew] Cuomo said the pandemic has created ‚a moment in history when we can actually incorporate and advance [Gates’s] ideas … all these buildings, all these physical classrooms — why with all the technology you have?‘ he asked, apparently rhetorically. It has taken some time to gel, but something resembling a coherent Pandemic Shock Doctrine is beginning to emerge. Call it the ‚Screen New Deal.‘ Far more high-tech than anything we have seen during previous disasters, the future that is being rushed into being as the bodies still pile up treats our past weeks of physical isolation not as a painful necessity to save lives, but as a living laboratory for a permanent — and highly profitable — no-touch future.“

11.05.2020, Tom

Andrea Bagnato on Red Zones, isolation, metaphors, blame, risk and coexistence (at e-flux architecture): „[…] the current manifestation of confinement is better thought of not so much as epidemic control, but as a form of risk displacement: a minority of workers is made to keep the economy going so that a majority of the population can stay at home. And the reverse is true as well: millions of people have to put up with extended confinement so that the risk posed by industrial workers doesn’t grow out of control. In the necropolitical calculations of the State, the physical health of workers and the mental health of everyone else are both a price worth paying.“

05.05.2020, Tom
mehrweniger Kurznews