DFFB Survey (1984)

From time to time, Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin (DFFB), where Skip Norman studied film between 1966 and 1969, conducted surveys among their alumni. This one, entitled DFFB “volljährig” (DFFB “adult”) was published in 1984 at the occasion of the institution’s 18th birthday. It mainly consists of filmographical data and answers to specific questions that the alumni handed in. The questions were sent in German, we translated them for this republication.

 

Arbeitest Du als Kameramann/frau, Cutter/in, Toningenieur/in, Regisseur/in, Autor/in, Produzent/in oder in welcher anderen filmberuflichen Funktion bist Du tätig?
Are you working as a cameraman/woman, editor, sound engineer, director, author, producer or in which other professional function are you working?

I am an independent filmmaker. As an independent I function as writer, director, cinematographer and editor.

Independent production makes it possible to function in all the important creative categories of filmmaking. One of the motivating factors for being an independent is control over content. Obvious disadvantages of independent production are the difficulties in gaining financial support and the limited opportunities for exhibition and distribution. Independent production is tied to a nonprofit ethos. As a result independents must rely on those agencies that provide financial support to nonprofit organizations. Such agencies are the brokers of the cultural and academic superstructure on the local, State and federal governments.

If the work of an independent is acceptable to the cultural gatekeepers (those who decide who gets money and how much), money is available. If the work of an independent is not acceptable (and this is not always a question of skill or competence), money is, obviously, not available. Although there is no direct cultural censorship, independents, nevertheless, walk a cultural tightrope because of the ethnocentricity of the majority culture. And most decisions in these agencies, that broker the little money available, are made by members of the majority culture. They are the ones with the decision-making jobs.

Although independent production is painful, frustrating, time consuming and exploitative, it provides the only avenue for the expression and advocacy that can be free of the onus of making money. But this also points to the fruitlessness of independent productions, because many films end up on the shelfs and in the closets of their makers for lack of exhibition and distribution possibilities. The biggest challenge for the independent is the making of a film that, because of its dynamic strength as a communications vehicle, demands to be seen.

Welche anderen Berufe oder bezahlten Tätigkeiten übst Du zusätzlich aus?
What other professions or paid activities do you additionally practice?

I teach filmmaking and study culture as an ethnographer.

Bist Du berufsständisch oder gewerkschaftlich organisiert?
Are you organized in a professional association or a union?

No!

Welche Erfahrungen hast Du mit Video gemacht?
What experiences do you have with video?

I have some experience in using video as a tool for teaching industrial skills and social values.

Hast Du schon für die „Neuen Medien” gearbeitet? Erhoffst Du Dir zusätzliche Auftrage von ihnen?
Have you already worked for the “New Media”? Are you hoping for additional jobs from them?

No, I have not worked for Television since leaving Berlin.

Still from Situationen (Johannes Beringer, 1967) showing some of the DFFB students of the “Class of 66″—Holger Meins, Günter Peter Straschek, Gerd Conradt, his wife Lena and their child Alfa, and Skip Norman.

Würdest Du nach Deinen Erfahrungen heute die umfassende Ausbildung an der Akademie noch gutheißen? Oder würdest Du mehr für eine Spezialisierung plädieren? (Beispiele)
After your experiences, would you still approve of the comprehensive training at the academy? Or would you advocate  for more specialization? (examples)

The most important aspects of my education at DFFB were the availability of practicing professional as instructors, equipment and money. I, personally, found the rather eclectic study program of my class beneficial, because it helped to define the kind of independent production in which I am presently involved. But I think that students should be offered the opportunity to satisfy their specialized interests, e.g., feature filmmaking, documentary filmmaking, ethnographic filmmaking (a program that should be developed and expanded in the near future), animation, experimental filmmaking, didactical filmmaking, film education, film theory and film criticism. There are many ways in which film and video can find ways into the socio-cultural structure of society and a film school should not be restricted to a few popular and available choices. Apart from a solid foundation in the essential skills of filmmaking, which should be demanded of each Student, DFFB should broaden its potential for providing avenues for its students to use those skills. This can only be done when film is seen as more than entertainment or advocacy, but also an instrument for studying culture and society.

Gibt es in Deiner Berufspraxis Zusammenarbeit mit Absolventen bzw. Akademie-Studenten?
Do you collaborate with graduates or academy students in your professional practice?

I hope to continue my working relationship with Jonatan Briel.

Verbindest Du mit dem Filmemachen noch eine Utopie oder fallen Vorstellungen und Wirklichkeit für Dich zusammen? (Wenn möglich ausführlich beschreiben)
Does filmmaking still have a utopian potential for you or do ideas and reality coincide for you? (Describe in detail if possible)

I believe that ideas are a product of reality. If Utopia is understood as a synonym for wishful thinking then Utopias exist. Filmmaking is a concrete, complex process and its successful execution, in spite of the magic inherent in the making, demands the confrontation with real ideas, real people and real technology. Although completing a film project may seem utopian to the uninitiated it is nevertheless a product of cold, hard, facts. Now there may be some wishful thinking in the creative process, and if so, it has got to be clothed in planning, skill, creative initiative, political awareness and hard work. There are no Utopias that are not rooted in reality.

Was machst Du, wenn Du keine Filme machst?
What do you do when you are not making movies?

When I am not making films in actual practice I am making films in my mind. Otherwise I read and live to learn.

Source: DFFB “volljährig”. Absolventen-Info 1984, Redaktion: Malte Ludin, Berlin: dffb 1984, pp. 67–68. Image: Deutsche Kinemathek. dffb-Archiv, courtesy of Johannes Beringer.

[Suggested citation: Skip Norman, “DFFB Survey,” Rosa Mercedes 03/A (January 2021), www.harun-farocki-institut.org/en/2021/01/28/dffb-survey-1984/]

Download PDF

go to top

January 28th, 2021 — Rosa Mercedes / 03 / A
Interface

Tatsiana Shchurko on the War in Ukraine, Entangled Imperialisms, and Transnational Feminist Solidarity, via LeftEast (May 2, 2022): “[An] uneven knowledge production and the many implications of the war against Ukraine reveal the dire need to develop a feminist anti-capitalist critique of multiple imperialisms. This language should grow from within the occupied and suppressed communities of Eastern Europe and Eurasia. An anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist feminist positionality grasps that the local is part of a global in an effort to build transnational connections of mutual aid and support against state and corporate violence. For example, statements of solidarity with Ukraine expressed by the International Committee of Indigenous Peoples of Russia and Native American communities along with the anti-war feminist march in Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan) on March 8, 2022, pointing out that the war in Ukraine should be of concern for a broad transnational community, may serve as instrumental examples of alternative anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist solidarities that stretch beyond state regulations and macro-politics and foreground decolonial perspectives, necessary in addressing entanglements of multiple imperialisms. Such solidarities also bring to light hidden interconnections of the past that allowed for distant communities to survive and support each other against the violence of imperialist intervention and its attendant capitalist exploitation. Thus, the march in Bishkek reminds of the socialist roots of the International Women’s Day to call for internationalist, intersectional, class solidarity against imperialism and militarism.”

Vasyl Cherepanyn on that “It’ll take more than tanks to ease Germany’s guilt” (via Politico): “Since the Soviet Union’s collapse, Germany has been imposing neocolonial optics on its Eastern European ‘peripheries,’ and on the post-Soviet space in particular, where Ukraine was long considered a gray buffer zone about which the EU was ‘deeply concerned.’ Germany didn’t bother itself much with differentiating between former Soviet countries’ pasts. Even until recently, any Ukrainian agenda in Germany was often ‘balanced’ with a Russian perspective, so as to not exclude the latter by any means.”

An unnamed anarchist and art scholar, who joined the Territorial Defense Forces, quoted by Olexii Kuchanskyi in an essay on “Digital Leviathan and His Nuclear Tail” (via Your Art and e-flux notes): “At dawn, Dima and I talked about cinema. Dima believes that cinema is inferior to literature as a means of expression because you spend much more time with a book than a film. It’s a really interesting point, something to dig into. I studied at the department of art theory & history and I never thought of it. Dima served in the military after school and worked at the factory all his life. He listens to rap, smokes pot, and tries to have fun. He is thirty-eight, his child was born last year. He likes Wong Kar-wai and is a fan of Asian cinema in general. Dima communicates by quoting Omar Khayyam, Confucius, and other awesome guys.”

April 20th, 2022

Vasyl Cherepanyn (Visual Culture Research Centre, Kyiv) on Putin’s “World War Z” and the West’s deadly “foot-dragging”, via Project Syndicate: “The main feature of this Western condition is constant belatedness. The West has always been too late, incapable of acting ahead and instead just reacting to what has already happened. As a Ukrainian joke went at the time, ‘While the European Union was taking a decision, Russia took Crimea.’ Then as now, Ukrainians wondered, ‘What is the West’s red line? What will compel the West to act instead of waiting and discussing when to intervene?’”

Barbara Wurm on Lithuanian director Mantas Kvedaravičius, killed in Mariupol, via Die Welt: “Kvedaravičius unfolded a whole spectrum of visual anthropology over a decade with only three films [Barzakh, Mariupolis, Parthenon]. It now awaits evaluation and exploration. The time will come. The films themselves make possible an infinite immersion in the matter of the world, between dream and reality, horror and everyday life, facts and phenomenal imagology.”

April 5th, 2022

Statement by #AfricansFromUA on Equal Treatment via e-flux notes: “Non-Ukrainian nationals from the war in Ukraine arriving in Germany have been facing very different terms of treatment—both in different federal states and cities but also within the very same city throughout time and different facilities. While some received so called ‘Fictitious Certificates’ for one year without further procedures others were pressured to submit an asylum application with their finger prints registered and passports seized. Again others were given a so called “Duldung” including the threat of deportation.”

April 5th, 2022
moreless news